IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jhisec/v42y2020i4p563-585_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Edmond Malinvaud’S Criticisms Of The New Classical Economics: Restoring The Nature And The Rationale Of The Old Keynesians’ Opposition

Author

Listed:
  • Renault, Matthieu

Abstract

Unlike standard accounts, recent research in the history of macroeconomics has given increasing attention to the Old Keynesians’ criticisms of the New Classical Economics. In this paper, I address the case of Edmond Malinvaud, who began opposing the New Classical Economics from the early 1980s and did so throughout the following thirty years. This study shows that his opposition was radical, i.e., multi-dimensional and systematic, and owes to the methodology and the practice of macroeconometric modeling. In turn, this twofold result sheds light on the nature and the rationale of the Old Keynesians’ opposition to the New Classical Economics from the 1970s onwards, which can be interpreted along the same lines.

Suggested Citation

  • Renault, Matthieu, 2020. "Edmond Malinvaud’S Criticisms Of The New Classical Economics: Restoring The Nature And The Rationale Of The Old Keynesians’ Opposition," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(4), pages 563-585, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:42:y:2020:i:4:p:563-585_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1053837219000610/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Goutsmedt, Aurélien & Truc, Alexandre, 2023. "An independent European macroeconomics? A history of European macroeconomics through the lens of the European Economic Review," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:42:y:2020:i:4:p:563-585_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/het .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.