IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jhisec/v40y2018i03p377-388_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eugenics And Socialist Thought In The Progressive Era: The Case Of James Medbery Mackaye

Author

Listed:
  • Fiorito, Luca
  • Foresti, Tiziana

Abstract

The aim of this essay is to assess James Medbery MacKaye’s contribution to socialist thought during the Progressive Era. Largely forgotten today, MacKaye proposed a special version of socialism, which he called “Pantocracy,” based on a peculiar blend of utilitarian and eugenic assumptions. Specifically, MacKaye held that biological fitness mapped to the capacity for happiness—biologically superior individuals possess a greater capacity for happiness—and saw the eugenic breeding of “a being or race of beings capable in the first place of happiness” as a possibility open by the advent of Pantocracy. Incidentally, this essay provides further evidence that the influence of eugenic and racialist beliefs upon the American Progressive Era political economy was so deep-rooted and pervasive that it did cut across traditional ideological boundaries.

Suggested Citation

  • Fiorito, Luca & Foresti, Tiziana, 2018. "Eugenics And Socialist Thought In The Progressive Era: The Case Of James Medbery Mackaye," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(3), pages 377-388, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:40:y:2018:i:03:p:377-388_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1053837218000019/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:40:y:2018:i:03:p:377-388_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/het .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.