IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jhisec/v34y2012i03p355-377_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relative Income Vs. Permanent Income: The Crisis Of The Theory Of The Social Significance Of Consumption

Author

Listed:
  • TREZZINI, ATTILIO

Abstract

The investigation of aggregate consumption underwent a radical change in the USA during the 1940s and 1950s. Principles deriving from the American Institutionalist tradition attained their greatest popularity in Duesenberry’s formulation just before they were rapidly abandoned. This paper examines this turning point by comparing Duesenberry’s relative income hypothesis and Friedman’s permanent income hypothesis. This also makes it possible to identify a particular feature of Duesenberry’s analysis—its heterogeneity—which must be taken into consideration by those seeking a return to Institutionalist principles in the analysis of aggregate consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Trezzini, Attilio, 2012. "Relative Income Vs. Permanent Income: The Crisis Of The Theory Of The Social Significance Of Consumption," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(3), pages 355-377, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:34:y:2012:i:03:p:355-377_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1053837212000375/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claudio Cantaro, 2022. "L'approccio classico-keynesiano e la teoria del ruolo sociale del consumo (The classical-Keynesian approach and the Theory of the Social Role of Consumption)," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 75(299), pages 285-306.
    2. Daria Pignalosa, 2021. "The Euler Equation Approach: Critical Implications of Recent Developments in the Theory of Intertemporal Choice," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 15(1), pages 1-43, June.
    3. Philippy, David, 2021. "Ellen Richards’s Home Economics Movement and the Birth of the Economics of Consumption," OSF Preprints v8yfk, Center for Open Science.
    4. Attilio Trezzini, 2017. "The Social Significance of Consumption and the Elasticity of Output to Demand in the Long Run: A Reply to Gualerzi," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 157-161, January.
    5. Drakopoulos, Stavros A., 2023. "The Economics of Wellbeing and Psychology: An Historical and Methodological Viewpoint," MPRA Paper 117891, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:34:y:2012:i:03:p:355-377_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/het .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.