IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jglhis/v19y2024i3p344-369_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Globalization, welfare, and inequality: Evidence from transoceanic market integration, 1815–1913

Author

Listed:
  • Chilosi, David
  • Federico, Giovanni

Abstract

This article contributes to the growing historical literature on the ‘first globalization’ (1815–1913) and income inequality in countries that exported agricultural products. International market integration is expected to increase the demand for exports and therefore their prices. We estimate the effects of increased prices from international market integration on national welfare and income inequality between and within regions in three major exporters of agricultural products—British India, Colonial Indonesia, and the United States—using the prices of eleven key primary commodities. Market integration significantly increased aggregate welfare, but the gains were unevenly distributed. Producing regions gained up to nearly 6% of their GDP. Since the regions that made most welfare gains were also the poorest in their countries, market integration mitigated inequality between regions. Within the southern United States and Java, plantation owners obtained most gains, causing a substantial increase in inequality between persons.

Suggested Citation

  • Chilosi, David & Federico, Giovanni, 2024. "Globalization, welfare, and inequality: Evidence from transoceanic market integration, 1815–1913," Journal of Global History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 344-369, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jglhis:v:19:y:2024:i:3:p:344-369_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1740022824000056/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jglhis:v:19:y:2024:i:3:p:344-369_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jgh .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.