IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v57y2022i5p1885-1928_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competition and R&D Financing: Evidence From the Biopharmaceutical Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Thakor, Richard T.
  • Lo, Andrew W.

Abstract

The interaction between product market competition, R&D investment, and the financing choices of R&D-intensive firms on the development of innovative products is only partially understood. We hypothesize that as competition increases, R&D-intensive firms will: i) increase R&D investment relative to existing assets in place; ii) carry more cash; and iii) maintain less net debt. Using the Hatch–Waxman Act as an exogenous shock to competition, we provide causal evidence supporting these hypotheses through a differences-in-differences analysis that exploits differences between the biopharma industry and other industries, and heterogeneity within the biopharma industry. We also explore how these changes affect innovative output.

Suggested Citation

  • Thakor, Richard T. & Lo, Andrew W., 2022. "Competition and R&D Financing: Evidence From the Biopharmaceutical Industry," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 57(5), pages 1885-1928, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:57:y:2022:i:5:p:1885-1928_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109021000284/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:57:y:2022:i:5:p:1885-1928_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.