IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v56y2021i6p2237-2271_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Liquidity Regulation and Financial Intermediaries

Author

Listed:
  • Macchiavelli, Marco
  • Pettit, Luke

Abstract

The liquidity-coverage ratio (LCR) requires banks to hold enough liquidity to withstand a 30-day run. We study the effects of the LCR on broker-dealers, the financial intermediaries at the epicenter of the 2007–2009 crisis. The LCR brings some financial-stability benefits, including a significant maturity extension of triparty repos backed by lower-quality collateral, as well as the accumulation of larger liquidity pools. However, it also leads to less liquidity transformation by broker-dealers. We also discuss the liquidity risks not addressed by the LCR. Finally, we show that a major source of fire-sale risk was self-corrected before the introduction of postcrisis regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Macchiavelli, Marco & Pettit, Luke, 2021. "Liquidity Regulation and Financial Intermediaries," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56(6), pages 2237-2271, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:56:y:2021:i:6:p:2237-2271_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109020000654/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabienne Schneider, 2024. "On-the-run Premia, Settlement Fails, and Central Bank Access," Working Papers 24.05, Swiss National Bank, Study Center Gerzensee.
    2. Mark Paddrik & Carlos Ramirez & Matthew McCormick, 2021. "The Dynamics of the U.S. Overnight Triparty Repo Market," Briefs 21-02, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury.
    3. Roberts, Daniel & Sarkar, Asani & Shachar, Or, 2023. "Liquidity regulations, bank lending and fire-sale risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    4. Thanassoulis, John & Erten, Irem & Neamtu, Ioana, 2022. "The Ring-Fencing Bonus," CEPR Discussion Papers 17625, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. Justus Inhoffen & Iman van Lelyveld, 2023. "Safe Asset Scarcity and Re-use in the European Repo Market," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2050, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:56:y:2021:i:6:p:2237-2271_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.