IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v56y2021i1p93-121_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trading in Fragmented Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Baldauf, Markus
  • Mollner, Joshua

Abstract

We study fragmentation of equity trading using a model of imperfect competition among exchanges. In the model, increased competition drives down trading fees. However, additional arbitrage opportunities arise in fragmented markets, intensifying adverse selection. Due to these opposing forces, the effects of fragmentation are context dependent. To empirically investigate the ambiguity in a single context, we estimate key parameters of the model with order-level data for an Australian security. According to the estimates, the benefits of increased competition are outweighed by the costs of multi-venue arbitrage. Compared with the prevailing duopoly, we predict the counterfactual monopoly spread to be 23% lower.

Suggested Citation

  • Baldauf, Markus & Mollner, Joshua, 2021. "Trading in Fragmented Markets," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56(1), pages 93-121, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:56:y:2021:i:1:p:93-121_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109019000814/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Babus, Ana & Parlatore, Cecilia, 2022. "Strategic fragmented markets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(3), pages 876-908.
    2. Bastidon, Cécile & Jawadi, Fredj, 2024. "Trade fragmentation and volatility-of-volatility networks," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Watson, Ethan D. & Woods, Donovan, 2022. "Exchange introduction and market competition: The entrance of MEMX and MIAX," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    4. Baldauf, Markus & Mollner, Joshua, 2022. "Fast traders make a quick buck: The role of speed in liquidity provision," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    5. Shahadat Hossain, 2022. "High-Frequency Trading (HFT) and Market Quality Research: An Evaluation of the Alternative HFT Proxies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-31, January.
    6. Sagade, Satchit & Scharnowski, Stefan & Theissen, Erik & Westheide, Christian, 2024. "A tale of two cities: Inter-market latency and fast-trader competition," SAFE Working Paper Series 430, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    7. Colin M. Van Oort & Ethan Ratliff-Crain & Brian F. Tivnan & Safwan Wshah, 2023. "Adaptive Agents and Data Quality in Agent-Based Financial Markets," Papers 2311.15974, arXiv.org.
    8. Suchismita Mishra & Le Zhao, 2021. "Order Routing Decisions for a Fragmented Market: A Review," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-32, November.
    9. Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Eyal Neuman & Yonatan Shadmi, 2024. "Fluid-Limits of Fragmented Limit-Order Markets," Papers 2407.04354, arXiv.org.
    10. Lausen, Jens & Clapham, Benjamin & Gomber, Peter & Bender, Micha, 2022. "Drivers and effects of stock market fragmentation - Insights on SME stocks," SAFE Working Paper Series 367, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    11. Ari Kutai & Daniel Nathan & Milena Wittwer, 2024. "Exchanges for government bonds? Evidence during COVID-19," Bank of Israel Working Papers 2024.03, Bank of Israel.
    12. Irtisam, Rasheek & Sokolov, Konstantin, 2023. "Do stock exchanges specialize? Evidence from the New Jersey transaction tax proposal," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:56:y:2021:i:1:p:93-121_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.