IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v54y2019i04p1713-1758_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Best of the Best: A Comparison of Factor Models

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed, Shamim
  • Bu, Ziwen
  • Tsvetanov, Daniel

Abstract

We compare major factor models and find that the Stambaugh and Yuan (2016) 4-factor model is the overall winner in the time-series domain. The Hou, Xue, and Zhang (2015) q-factor model takes second place and the Fama and French (2015) 5-factor model and the Barillas and Shanken (2018) 6-factor model jointly take third place. The pairwise cross-sectional R2 and the multiple model comparison tests show that the Hou et al. (2015) q-factor model, the Fama and French (2015) 5-factor and 4-factor models, and the Barillas and Shanken (2018) 6-factor model take equal first place in the horse race.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed, Shamim & Bu, Ziwen & Tsvetanov, Daniel, 2019. "Best of the Best: A Comparison of Factor Models," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(4), pages 1713-1758, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:54:y:2019:i:04:p:1713-1758_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109018000947/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmed, Shamim & Bu, Ziwen & Symeonidis, Lazaros & Tsvetanov, Daniel, 2023. "Which factor model? A systematic return covariation perspective," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    2. Gregory Nazaire & Maria Pacurar & Oumar Sy, 2020. "Betas versus characteristics: A practical perspective," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 26(5), pages 1385-1413, November.
    3. Söhnke M. Bartram & Harald Lohre & Peter F. Pope & Ananthalakshmi Ranganathan, 2021. "Navigating the factor zoo around the world: an institutional investor perspective," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(5), pages 655-703, July.
    4. Fang, Ming & Taylor, Stephen, 2021. "A machine learning based asset pricing factor model comparison on anomaly portfolios," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    5. Thuy Duong Dang & Fabian Hollstein & Marcel Prokopczuk & Zhiguo He, 2023. "Which Factors for Corporate Bond Returns?," The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 13(4), pages 615-652.
    6. Kristoffer Pons Bertelsen, 2022. "The Prior Adaptive Group Lasso and the Factor Zoo," CREATES Research Papers 2022-05, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    7. Zhang, Jinhua & Wang, Guipu & Yan, Cheng, 2020. "Can foreign equity funds outperform their benchmarks? New evidence from fund-holding data for China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 11-20.
    8. Cristian Andrei Budris & Bogdan Dima, 2024. "Exploring The Fama-French Five Factor Model Within a Time-Varying Parameters Framework," The Review of Finance and Banking, Academia de Studii Economice din Bucuresti, Romania / Facultatea de Finante, Asigurari, Banci si Burse de Valori / Catedra de Finante, vol. 16(2), pages 309-357, December.
    9. Dong, Dayong & Wu, Keke & Fang, Jianchun & Gozgor, Giray & Yan, Cheng, 2022. "Investor attention factors and stock returns: Evidence from China," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    10. Angelidis, Timotheos & Tessaromatis, Nikolaos, 2023. "The disappearing profitability of volatility-managed equity factors," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    11. Radi, Sherrihan & Gebka, Bartosz & Kallinterakis, Vasileios, 2024. "The wisdom of the madness of crowds: Investor herding, anti-herding, and stock-bond return correlation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 966-995.
    12. Aysenur Tarakcioglu Altinay & Mesut Dogan & Bilge Leyli Demirel Ergun & Sevdie Alshiqi, 2023. "The Fama-French Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model: A Research on Borsa Istanbul," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 3-21.
    13. Ma, Xiuli & Zhang, Xindong & Liu, Weimin, 2021. "Further tests of asset pricing models: Liquidity risk matters," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 255-273.
    14. Huber, Daniel & Jacobs, Heiko & Müller, Sebastian & Preissler, Fabian, 2023. "International factor models," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:54:y:2019:i:04:p:1713-1758_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.