IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v52y2017i03p1111-1141_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investment–Cash Flow Sensitivity: Fact or Fiction?

Author

Listed:
  • Ağca, Şenay
  • Mozumdar, Abon

Abstract

We examine whether internal funds matter for investment when the measurement error in q is addressed. By carefully employing methodologies that tackle the measurement error in q, we show that cash flow is a significant determinant of investment. We also find that an analyst-forecast-based q measure is not superior to a stock-market-based q measure. We further propose an approach that uses two alternative proxies of q as instruments for addressing measurement error. Our evidence indicates that instrumental-variables-type generalized method of moments estimators yield empirically well-specified models.

Suggested Citation

  • Ağca, Şenay & Mozumdar, Abon, 2017. "Investment–Cash Flow Sensitivity: Fact or Fiction?," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(3), pages 1111-1141, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:52:y:2017:i:03:p:1111-1141_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109017000230/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Xun, 2022. "Financial liberalization and the investment-cash flow sensitivity," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Niclas Andrén & Håkan Jankensgård, 2020. "Disappearing investment‐cash flow sensitivities: Earnings have not become a worse proxy for cash flow," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5-6), pages 760-785, May.
    3. Alfonsina Iona & Leone Leonida, 2018. "Sample separation and the sensitivity of investment to cash flow: Is the monotonicity condition empirically satisfied?," Working Papers 862, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    4. Guido Ascari & Qazi Haque & Leandro M. Magnusson & Sophocles Mavroeidis, 2024. "Empirical evidence on the Euler equation for investment in the US," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 543-563, June.
    5. Ghulam Hussain Khan Zaigham & Xiangning Wang & Haji Suleman Ali, 2019. "Causal Relation Between Stock Market Performance and Firm Investment in China: Mediating Role of Information Asymmetry," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(4), pages 21582440198, October.
    6. Mustafa Cayir & Nasuh Oguzhan Altay, 2021. "Direct and Indirect Effects of Cash Dividend Policies on Firms’ Capital Accumulation in Selected Developed Markets," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 50(2), pages 235-254, November.
    7. Basu, Debarati & Sen, Kaustav, 2022. "Organizational form and access to capital: The role of regulatory interventions," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(3).
    8. Sai Ding & Minjoo Kim & Xiao Zhang, 2021. "New Insight on Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivity," Working Papers 2021_16, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    9. Alfonsina Iona & Leone Leonida, 2024. "Classes of homogeneous financing constraints and corporate investment," Working Papers 982, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    10. Chacko Jacob & Jijo Lukose P.J., 2019. "Institutional ownership and the investment-cash flow sensitivity Evidence from India," Working papers 329, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    11. Nie, Jing & Yin, Libo, 2022. "Do dividends signal safety? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    12. Braun, Matías & Marcet, Francisco & Raddatz, Claudio, 2024. "The good, the bad, and the not-so-ugly of credit booms?: capital allocation and financial constraints," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    13. Emmanuel Adu‐Ameyaw & Albert Danso & Moshfique Uddin & Samuel Acheampong, 2024. "Investment‐cash flow sensitivity: Evidence from investment in identifiable intangible and tangible assets activities," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 1179-1204, April.
    14. Viktoriya Lantushenko & Edward Nelling, 2022. "Institutional Ownership Volatility and Investment Behavior of REITs," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 25(2), pages 161-198.
    15. Jiří Schwarz & Martin Pospíšil, 2018. "Bankruptcy, Investment, and Financial Constraints: Evidence from the Czech Republic," Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 99-121, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:52:y:2017:i:03:p:1111-1141_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.