IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v51y2016i03p899-927_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Boards and SEOs: The Effect of Certification and Monitoring

Author

Listed:
  • Ferreira, Miguel
  • Laux, Paul

Abstract

In a sample of underwritten seasoned equity offerings (SEOs), issuers with boards dominated by independent directors experience higher abnormal announcement returns than issuers with boards dominated by insiders. Firm size, transparency, and other governance characteristics do not explain the effect of board independence. The positive relation between board independence and SEO returns is more pronounced for firms with lower monitoring costs and more severe financial constraints. The evidence suggests that independent directors have a positive effect because of their role in controlling both shareholder–manager conflicts (monitoring the use of funds) and current–new shareholder conflicts (certification of the issue’s value).

Suggested Citation

  • Ferreira, Miguel & Laux, Paul, 2016. "Corporate Boards and SEOs: The Effect of Certification and Monitoring," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(3), pages 899-927, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:51:y:2016:i:03:p:899-927_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109016000405/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fan, Yaoyao & Ly, Kim Cuong & Jiang, Yuxiang, 2023. "Institutional investor networks and firm innovation: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Dong, Yunhe & Luo, Haoyi & Xu, Zijin & Yang, Xing, 2024. "Cash, crisis, and capers: The UK's cashbox policy during COVID-19," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    3. Cathy Xuying Cao & Chongyang Chen & Ekaterina E. Emm & Bo Han, 2022. "Corporate diversification and seasoned equity offering performance," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 581-614, February.
    4. Lee, Chin-Chong & Poon, Wai-Ching, 2018. "Wealth transfers in rights offerings and the protective instruments," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 335-357.
    5. Dawood Ashraf & Mohsin Khawaja & M. Ishaq Bhatti, 2022. "Raising capital amid economic policy uncertainty: an empirical investigation," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-32, December.
    6. Yang, Mingjing & Cheng, Xiaoke & Chan, Kam C. & Gao, Shenghao, 2018. "Information cost or heterogeneous beliefs? An examination of the impact of value uncertainty on auction-style SEO discounts in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 206-217.
    7. Autore, Don M. & Jones, Timothy & Kovacs, Tunde & Peterson, David R., 2021. "Confidential marketing in seasoned equity offers," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    8. Fauver, Larry & Loureiro, Gilberto & Taboada, Alvaro G., 2017. "The impact of regulation on information quality and performance around seasoned equity offerings: International evidence," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 73-98.
    9. Dong, Yunhe & Luo, Haoyi & Xu, Zijin & Yang, Xing, 2024. "Investing while lending: Do index funds improve managerial information disclosure?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    10. Huang, Kuo-Cheng & Wang, Yu-Chun, 2023. "How do investors underreact to seasoned equity offerings? Evidence from Taiwan's corporate governance evaluation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:51:y:2016:i:03:p:899-927_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.