IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v51y2016i01p165-196_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flashes of Trading Intent at NASDAQ

Author

Listed:
  • Skjeltorp, Johannes A.
  • Sojli, Elvira
  • Tham, Wing Wah

Abstract

We use the introduction and subsequent removal of the flash-order functionality from NASDAQ as a natural experiment to investigate the impact of voluntary disclosure of trading intent on market quality. We find that flash orders significantly improve liquidity in NASDAQ. Furthermore, overall market quality improves (deteriorates) when flash functionality is introduced (removed). This result can be attributed to increased competition among liquidity suppliers across competing trading venues. Alternatively, flash orders attract responses from reactive traders immediately after the announcement, attracting more “hidden liquidity” and lowering risk-bearing costs for the overall market.

Suggested Citation

  • Skjeltorp, Johannes A. & Sojli, Elvira & Tham, Wing Wah, 2016. "Flashes of Trading Intent at NASDAQ," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(1), pages 165-196, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:51:y:2016:i:01:p:165-196_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109016000028/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dionne, Georges & Zhou, Xiaozhou, 2019. "Information Environments and High Price Impact Trades: Implication for Volatility and Price Efficiency," Working Papers 19-3, HEC Montreal, Canada Research Chair in Risk Management, revised 04 Nov 2019.
    2. Nimalendran, Mahendrarajah & Rzayev, Khaladdin & Sagade, Satchit, 2022. "High-frequency trading in the stock market and the costs of option market making," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118885, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Wing Wah Tham & Elvira Sojli & Johannes A. Skjeltorp, 2018. "Cross-Sided Liquidity Externalities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 2901-2929, June.
    4. Nimalendran, Mahendrarajah & Rzayev, Khaladdin & Sagade, Satchit, 2024. "High-frequency trading in the stock market and the costs of options market making," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124228, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Liu, Xia & Liu, Shancun & Qi, Zhen & Wen, Chunhui, 2020. "Discretionary liquidity trading, information production and market efficiency," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:51:y:2016:i:01:p:165-196_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.