IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v50y2015i03p597-622_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Suitability Checks and Household Investments in Structured Products

Author

Listed:
  • Chang, Eric C.
  • Tang, Dragon Yongjun
  • Zhang, Miao Ben

Abstract

The suitability of complex financial products for household investors is an important issue in light of consumer financial protection. The U.S. Dodd–Frank Act, for instance, mandates that distributors check suitability when selling structured products to retail investors. However, little empirical evidence exists on such transactions. Using data from Hong Kong, we find that investors purchase 8% more structured products, on average, when the suitability is not checked. The effect of suitability checks is more pronounced for less financially literate investors. Moreover, investors tend to buy products with lower risk-adjusted returns when product suitability is not checked.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang, Eric C. & Tang, Dragon Yongjun & Zhang, Miao Ben, 2015. "Suitability Checks and Household Investments in Structured Products," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(3), pages 597-622, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:50:y:2015:i:03:p:597-622_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109015000265/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bertrand, Philippe & Prigent, Jean-luc, 2019. "On the optimality of path-dependent structured funds: The cost of standardization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 333-350.
    2. Lunn, Pete & McGowan, Féidhlim & Howard, Noel, 2018. "Do some financial product features negatively affect consumer decisions? a review of evidence," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS78.
    3. Marc Arnold & Dustin Schuette & Alexander Wagner, 2021. "Neglected Risk in Financial Innovation: Evidence from Structured Product Counterparty Exposure," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 27(2), pages 287-325, March.
    4. Henderson, Brian J. & Pearson, Neil D. & Wang, Li, 2020. "Pre-trade hedging: Evidence from the issuance of retail structured products," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 108-128.
    5. Li, Xindan & Subrahmanyam, Avanidhar & Yang, Xuewei, 2018. "Can financial innovation succeed by catering to behavioral preferences? Evidence from a callable options market," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 38-65.
    6. Chul Choi, 2024. "The Microstructure of Mis-Selling: Financial Investment Markets and Regulation in Korea," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 13, January.
    7. Gao, Pengjie & Hu, Allen & Kelly, Peter & Peng, Cameron & Zhu, Ning, 2020. "Exploited by complexity," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118867, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Ammann, Manuel & Arnold, Marc & Straumann, Simon, 2023. "Pricing, issuance volume, and design of innovative securities: The role of investor information," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:50:y:2015:i:03:p:597-622_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.