IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v49y2014i02p297-319_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does the Market Value Toxic Assets?

Author

Listed:
  • Longstaff, Francis A.
  • Myers, Brett W.

Abstract

How does the market value “toxic” structured-credit securities? We study the valuation of what is possibly the most toxic of all toxic assets: the equity tranche of a collateralized debt obligation (CDO). In theory, CDO equity should be similar in nature to bank stock since both represent residual claims on a portfolio of loans. We find CDO equity returns are much more related to stock returns than to fixed-income returns. CDO equity returns track the returns of financial stocks much more closely than any other industry. Nearly two-thirds of the variation in CDO returns can be explained by fundamentals.

Suggested Citation

  • Longstaff, Francis A. & Myers, Brett W., 2014. "How Does the Market Value Toxic Assets?," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 297-319, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:49:y:2014:i:02:p:297-319_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109014000222/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Augustin, Patrick & Subrahmanyam, Marti G. & Tang, Dragon Yongjun & Wang, Sarah Qian, 2014. "Credit Default Swaps: A Survey," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 9(1-2), pages 1-196, December.
    2. Larry Cordell & Michael R. Roberts & Michael Schwert, 2023. "CLO Performance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 78(3), pages 1235-1278, June.
    3. Andrew Carverhill & Dan Luo, 2020. "Pricing and integration of credit default swap index tranches," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(4), pages 503-526, April.
    4. Dan Luo & Dragon Yongjun Tang & Sarah Qian Wang, 2018. "Model specification and collateralized debt obligation (mis)pricing," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(11), pages 1284-1312, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:49:y:2014:i:02:p:297-319_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.