IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v32y1997i01p71-90_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Box Spread Arbitrage Profits following the 1987 Market Crash: Real or Illusory?

Author

Listed:
  • Hemler, Michael L.
  • Miller, Thomas W.

Abstract

We examine market efficiency before and after the 1987 Market Crash using the box spread strategy implemented with European-style S&P 500 Index (SPX) options. Before the Crash, apparent arbitrage opportunities were rare and simulated trades were unprofitable assuming a one-minute execution delay. After the Crash, apparent arbitrage opportunities were frequent and simulated trades were profitable even assuming a five-minute execution delay. Our analysis makes the routine assumption that quotes are good until updated to construct a time series of prevailing quotes sampled at 30-second intervals. If this assumption is valid, then arbitrage profits were actually available. If this assumption is invalid, then such profits could have been illusory. Either scenario, however, implies that SPX market efficiency decreased following the Crash—prevailing price quotes repeatedly failed to satisfy the fundamental parity relation underlying the box spread.

Suggested Citation

  • Hemler, Michael L. & Miller, Thomas W., 1997. "Box Spread Arbitrage Profits following the 1987 Market Crash: Real or Illusory?," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(1), pages 71-90, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:32:y:1997:i:01:p:71-90_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109000000673/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fahlenbrach, Rüdiger & Sandås, Patrik, 2010. "Does information drive trading in option strategies?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 2370-2385, October.
    2. Joseph K. W. Fung & Henry M. K. Mok & Kenneth C. K. Wong, 2004. "Pricing Efficiency in a Thin Market with Competitive Market Makers: Box Spread Strategies in the Hang Seng Index Options Market," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 39(3), pages 435-454, August.
    3. Okorie, David Iheke & Bouri, Elie & Mazur, Mieszko, 2024. "NFTs versus conventional cryptocurrencies: A comparative analysis of market efficiency around COVID-19 and the Russia-Ukraine conflict," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 126-151.
    4. Zigrand, Jean-Pierre, 1999. "Arbitrage and endogenous market integration," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119127, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Fung, Joseph K. W. & Mok, Henry M. K., 2003. "Early unwinding of options-futures arbitrage with bid/ask quotations and transaction prices," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 121-133, July.
    6. Chin‐Ho Chen & Junmao Chiu & Huimin Chung, 2020. "Arbitrage opportunities, liquidity provision, and trader types in an index option market," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(3), pages 279-307, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:32:y:1997:i:01:p:71-90_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.