IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v17y1982i03p441-449_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Valuation, Beta, and the Cost of Equity Capital: A Note

Author

Listed:
  • Yagill, Joe

Abstract

The issue of capital structure has been intensively examined in the finance literature, particularly after the appearance of the landmark 1958 paper by Modigliani and Miller [8], hereafter MM. In that paper, MM derived a relationship in terms of the expected return on equity of a levered and unlevered firm, known as MM Proposition II. Their analysis was extended later by researchers such as Hamada [5] and Rubinstein [9] who derived the corresponding relationship in terms of the systematic risk (beta). Both these risk-return relationships have been derived for the case of perfect capital markets and the case in which corporate income taxes are the only type of market imperfection. Although effects of other types of market imperfections such as personal income taxes and bankruptcy costs have been examined in numerous studies, neither MM Proposition II nor the “beta” relationship were extended to include the effects of personal income taxes and bankruptcy costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Yagill, Joe, 1982. "On Valuation, Beta, and the Cost of Equity Capital: A Note," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(3), pages 441-449, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:17:y:1982:i:03:p:441-449_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109000010395/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laurence Booth, 2007. "Capital Cash Flows, APV and Valuation," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 13(1), pages 29-48, January.
    2. Kevin Amess & Sourafel Girma, 2009. "Do Stock Markets Value Efficiency?," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 56(3), pages 321-331, July.
    3. Syed Manzur Quader & Mohammad Nayeem Abdullah, 2020. "How financial market in Bangladesh appraises efficiency?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 475-494, August.
    4. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:17:y:1982:i:03:p:441-449_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.