IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v14y1979i03p529-535_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A State Preference Model of Capital Gains Taxation

Author

Listed:
  • Dyl, Edward A.

Abstract

Economists generally agree that a basic characteristic of a good tax is economic neutrality. That is, a tax should not influence economic behavior unless it was intentionally designed to produce a specific effect. In this context, the economic effects of the current system of capital gains taxation in the United States have been the subject of considerable concern. Most researchers have concluded that the current system of capital gains taxation has an undesirable and destabilizing effect on the securities markets because the practices of taxing capital gains only when they are realized and, correspondingly, allowing tax deductions for capital losses only upon realization, presumably cause investors to defer the realization of capital gains and to accelerate the realization of capital losses. Based upon this behavioral assumption, many economists infer an effect on the securities markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Dyl, Edward A., 1979. "A State Preference Model of Capital Gains Taxation," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 529-535, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:14:y:1979:i:03:p:529-535_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109000005470/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lorenz, Daniela, 2009. "Portfolioauswahl bei Besteuerung realisierter Kursänderungen," Discussion Papers 2009/17, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    2. Klein, Peter, 2004. "The capital gain lock-in effect and perfect substitutes," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 2765-2783, December.
    3. Rümmele, Peter, 1997. "Arbitragefreie Kapitalmärkte und Steuern," Tübinger Diskussionsbeiträge 109, University of Tübingen, School of Business and Economics.
    4. Hanlon, Dean & Pinder, Sean, 2007. "An empirical investigation of whether Australian capital gains tax reforms influence individual investor behaviour," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 481-493, November.
    5. Dean Hanlon & Sean Pinder, 2013. "Capital gains tax, supply-driven trading and ownership structure: direct evidence of the lock-in effect," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 53(2), pages 419-439, June.
    6. Klein, Peter, 2001. "The capital gain lock-in effect and long-horizon return reversal," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 33-62, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:14:y:1979:i:03:p:529-535_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.