IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v8y2021i3p285-295_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Geostrategic Competition on Public Attitudes to Aid

Author

Listed:
  • Wood, Terence
  • Hoy, Chris
  • Pryke, Jonathan

Abstract

China’s rise is ushering in a new era of geostrategic contestation involving foreign aid. In many traditional OECD donors, aid policy is changing as a result. We report on a survey experiment studying the impacts of rising Chinese aid on public opinion in traditional donors. We randomly treated people with vignettes emphasising China’s rise as an aid donor in the Pacific, a region of substantial geostrategic competition. We used a large, nationally-representative sample of Australians (Australia is the largest donor to the Pacific). As expected, treating participants reduced hostility to aid and increased support for more aid focused on the Pacific. Counter to expectations, however, treatment reduced support for using aid to advance Australian interests. These findings were largely replicated in a separate experiment in New Zealand. Knowledge of Chinese competition changes support for aid, but it does not increase support for using aid as a tool of geostrategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Wood, Terence & Hoy, Chris & Pryke, Jonathan, 2021. "The Effect of Geostrategic Competition on Public Attitudes to Aid," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 285-295, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:8:y:2021:i:3:p:285-295_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2052263020000275/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:8:y:2021:i:3:p:285-295_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.