IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v11y2024i1p90-101_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Corrections Dilemma: Media Retractions Increase Belief Accuracy But Decrease Trust

Author

Listed:
  • Freitag, Joshua
  • Gochee, Madeline
  • Ransden, Mitchell
  • Nyhan, Brendan
  • Roschke, Kristy
  • Gillmor, Dan

Abstract

Why are prominent news media retractions so rare? Using data from a survey experiment in which respondents view simulated Twitter newsfeeds, we demonstrate the dilemma facing news organizations that have published false information. Encouragingly, media retractions are effective at informing the public – they increase the accuracy of news consumers’ beliefs about the retracted reporting more than information from third parties questioning the original reporting or even the combination of the two. However, trust in the news outlet declines after a retraction, though this effect is small both substantively and in standardized terms relative to the increase in belief accuracy. This reputational damage persists even if the outlet issues a retraction before a third party questions the story. In a social media environment that frequently subjects reporting to intense scrutiny, the journalistic mission of news organizations to inform the public will increasingly conflict with organizational incentives to avoid admitting error.

Suggested Citation

  • Freitag, Joshua & Gochee, Madeline & Ransden, Mitchell & Nyhan, Brendan & Roschke, Kristy & Gillmor, Dan, 2024. "The Corrections Dilemma: Media Retractions Increase Belief Accuracy But Decrease Trust," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 90-101, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:90-101_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2052263023000040/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:90-101_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.