IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v11y2024i1p78-89_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Limits of Lobbying: Null Effects from Four Field Experiments in Two State Legislatures

Author

Listed:
  • Camp, Matthew J.
  • Schwam-Baird, Michael
  • Zelizer, Adam

Abstract

It is widely thought that lobbyists exert influence over legislators’ policy positions and, as a result, over policy outcomes. One mechanism of influence is the provision of policy expertise. Yet, there is little credible empirical evidence that lobbyists’ expertise influences legislative outcomes. Across four experiments fielded with three lobbyists in two state legislatures that examine two public measures of legislators’ positions, we find no evidence that lobbyists’ expertise influences legislators’ policy positions. We do find, in contrast, that the same policy expertise treatment is influential when provided by a legislative staffer. We conclude that policy information can influence legislators’ positions, but that legislators are cautious when that information is provided by lobbyists.

Suggested Citation

  • Camp, Matthew J. & Schwam-Baird, Michael & Zelizer, Adam, 2024. "The Limits of Lobbying: Null Effects from Four Field Experiments in Two State Legislatures," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 78-89, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:78-89_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2052263022000252/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:78-89_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.