IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jbcoan/v15y2024i2p351-373_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Ancillary Effect of Patient Navigation Following Detox: Fewer Arrests

Author

Listed:
  • Rosenman, Robert
  • Noonan, Carolyn
  • Muller, Clemma
  • Maclehose, Rich
  • Trojan, Jodi
  • Poole, Erin
  • Manson, Spero M.

Abstract

Patient navigation (PN) is increasingly used to help people overcome barriers to accessing health care. In a recent trial, PN was added to motivational interviewing (MI) to help patients discharged from detoxification (detox) transition to follow-up care. The goal was to test whether PN in addition to MI increased transition rates and reduced subsequent readmissions into detox compared with MI alone. Results demonstrated little evidence of a treatment effect on either of these two outcomes, but post hoc exploratory analyses showed that patients who received PN were less likely to be arrested in the year following discharge than patients who did not receive PN. In addition, the group that received PN had fewer multiple arrests resulting in a lower average number of arrests per person. These findings are hypothesis-generating and need replication for conclusive inference. Nevertheless, economic analysis indicates that PN after detox could be a cost-beneficial intervention to reduce arrests among a population at high risk for involvement in the criminal justice system.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosenman, Robert & Noonan, Carolyn & Muller, Clemma & Maclehose, Rich & Trojan, Jodi & Poole, Erin & Manson, Spero M., 2024. "An Ancillary Effect of Patient Navigation Following Detox: Fewer Arrests," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 351-373, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jbcoan:v:15:y:2024:i:2:p:351-373_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2194588824000241/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jbcoan:v:15:y:2024:i:2:p:351-373_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bca .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.