IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jagaec/v8y1976i02p1-4_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Forage Quality Restrictions on Optimal Production Systems Determined by Linear Programming

Author

Listed:
  • Whitson, Robert E.
  • Parks, Don L.
  • Herd, Dennis B.

Abstract

Due to changing feed price relationships for beef production, it is anticipated that linear programming (LP) will be used to develop optimal feeding strategies for cow-calf operations in the South. An important relationship between forage quality and forage intake has been ignored in previous LP analyses. Forage quality and cows' intake of it are inversely related; i.e., as forage quality decreases with maturity, a cow's or calf's consumption of a particular forage must increase to continue meeting the animal's nutritional requirements. However, as the quality of forage decreases, digestibility decreases, and the animal's maximum intake capacity of that forage decreases (Figure 1). It is hypothesized that consideration of intake restrictions will change the optimal LP forage production system, livestock grazing system or supplemental feeding strategies when forages are an important nutrient source.

Suggested Citation

  • Whitson, Robert E. & Parks, Don L. & Herd, Dennis B., 1976. "Effects of Forage Quality Restrictions on Optimal Production Systems Determined by Linear Programming," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 1-4, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:8:y:1976:i:02:p:1-4_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0081305200013157/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shumway, C. Richard & Gebremeskel, Tesfaye, 1978. "Impact Of Risk Averse Behavior On Fertilizer Demand For Tame Forages," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(1), pages 1-7, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:8:y:1976:i:02:p:1-4_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.