IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jagaec/v6y1974i01p79-89_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rural Development Research Programs of Southern 1862 and 1890 Land Grant Institutions: Characteristics, Needs, and Priorities for the 1970's

Author

Listed:
  • Davis, Carlton G.

Abstract

Acceptance and increased interest in rural development as a legitimate concern of land grant institutions is well documented. Although rural development research is not “new” for the discipline of agricultural economics, there is little doubt that the area has experienced renewed and greatly expanded interest at both the national and regional levels by the passage of the 1972 Rural Development Act.While much has been written on the importance and need for a direct frontal attack on this traditionally underfunded and low priority research area, the sad fact is that the profession is still without a clear sense of direction regarding research and extension needs and priorities. The establishment of state and regional rural development centers is a positive step toward directing and coordinating the limited resources available in this area. Many southern states have demonstrated significant leadership roles in this first step, obviously recognizing the massive rural development problems of the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Davis, Carlton G., 1974. "Rural Development Research Programs of Southern 1862 and 1890 Land Grant Institutions: Characteristics, Needs, and Priorities for the 1970's," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(1), pages 79-89, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:6:y:1974:i:01:p:79-89_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0081305200011559/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Polopolus, Leo C., 1990. "Current Status And Future Directions Of Agricultural Economics Programs At 1890 Institutions: Discussion," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(1), pages 1-4, July.
    2. Otto, Daniel M. & Havlicek, Joseph, Jr., 1979. "Analysis Of Usda Funded Rural Development Research Programs In The United States And The Southern Region," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:6:y:1974:i:01:p:79-89_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.