IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jagaec/v2y1970i01p91-96_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

General Cropland Retirement: Effects on the South of Retiring Low-Net-Return Acreage vs. Retiring High-Cost Production

Author

Listed:
  • Zepp, Glenn A.
  • Sharples, Jerry A.

Abstract

Recently renewed interest has been shown in new programs for United States Agriculture. Long-term cropland retirement is one of the proposals that has received serious consideration. This report presents for consideration some insight gained on only one facet of general cropland retirement. Selecting which cropland to retire and its effect on the South in particular, have been considered under two different criteria. Both criteria retire cropland and production but the emphases differ.

Suggested Citation

  • Zepp, Glenn A. & Sharples, Jerry A., 1970. "General Cropland Retirement: Effects on the South of Retiring Low-Net-Return Acreage vs. Retiring High-Cost Production," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 91-96, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:2:y:1970:i:01:p:91-96_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0081305200009869/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Irwin, George D. & Sharples, Jerry A. & Berry, John H., 1970. "Part-Farm General Cropland Retirement: Effects Of Some Alternative Program Specifications," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 2(1), pages 1-5, December.
    2. Lanier, Eleanor B., 1972. "Economics of Agriculture: Reports and Publications Issued or Sponsored by USDA's Economic Research Service, July 1970-June 1971," Miscellaneous Publications 321803, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:2:y:1970:i:01:p:91-96_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.