IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/intorg/v75y2021i2p611-634_16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Struggles for Recognition: The Liberal International Order and the Merger of Its Discontents

Author

Listed:
  • Adler-Nissen, Rebecca
  • Zarakol, Ayşe

Abstract

The Liberal International Order (LIO) is currently being undermined not only by states such as Russia but also by voters in the West. We argue that both veins of discontent are driven by resentment toward the LIO's status hierarchy, rather than simply by economic grievances. Approaching discontent historically and sociologically, we show that there are two strains of recognition struggles against the LIO: one in the core of the West, driven by populist politicians and their voters, and one on the semiperiphery, fueled by competitively authoritarian governments and their supporters. At this particular moment in history, these struggles are digitally, ideologically, and organizationally interconnected in their criticism of LIO institutions, amplifying each other. The LIO is thus being hollowed out from within at a time when it is also facing some of its greatest external challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Adler-Nissen, Rebecca & Zarakol, Ayşe, 2021. "Struggles for Recognition: The Liberal International Order and the Merger of Its Discontents," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 75(2), pages 611-634, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:75:y:2021:i:2:p:611-634_16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020818320000454/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias, 2024. "Building bridges or digging the trench? International organizations, social media, and polarized fragmentation," Global Cooperation Research Papers 34, University of Duisburg-Essen, Käte Hamburger Kolleg / Centre for Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21).
    2. Aaron McKeil, 2022. "Revisiting the World Order Models Project: A Case for Renewal?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(4), pages 417-426, September.
    3. Senem Aydın‐Düzgit & Gergana Noutcheva, 2022. "External Contestations of Europe: Russia and Turkey as Normative Challengers?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1815-1831, November.
    4. Wil Hout & Michal Onderco, 2022. "Developing Countries and the Crisis of the Liberal International Order," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 1-5.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:75:y:2021:i:2:p:611-634_16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ino .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.