IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/intorg/v74y2020i4p810-832_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Promise of Peacekeeping: Protecting Civilians in Civil Wars

Author

Listed:
  • Carnegie, Allison
  • Mikulaschek, Christoph

Abstract

Do peacekeepers protect civilians in civil conflict? Securing civilian safety is a key objective of contemporary peacekeeping missions, yet whether these efforts actually make a difference on the ground is widely debated in large part because of intractable endogeneity concerns and selection bias. To overcome these issues, we use an instrumental variables design, leveraging exogenous variation in the rotation of African members of the United Nations Security Council and looking at its effects on African civil wars. We show that states that wield more power send more peacekeepers to their preferred locations, and that these peacekeepers in turn help to protect civilians. We thus demonstrate the robustness of many existing results to a plausible identification strategy and present a method that can also be applied to other diverse settings in international relations.

Suggested Citation

  • Carnegie, Allison & Mikulaschek, Christoph, 2020. "The Promise of Peacekeeping: Protecting Civilians in Civil Wars," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 74(4), pages 810-832, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:74:y:2020:i:4:p:810-832_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020818320000442/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:74:y:2020:i:4:p:810-832_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ino .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.