IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/intorg/v1y1947i1p46-73_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The General Assembly

Author

Listed:
  • Anonymous

Abstract

The First Part of the First Session of the United Nations General Assembly met in London from January 10 to February 14, 1946, and held thirty-three plenary meetings, at which delegates representing each of the 51 United Nations dealt primarily with matters of procedure and organization. The principal item on the agenda was the report of the Preparatory Commission, which contained recommendations designed to bring the United Nations into active operation.

Suggested Citation

  • Anonymous, 1947. "The General Assembly," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 46-73, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:1:y:1947:i:1:p:46-73_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020818300006597/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kim ChanWahn, 2010. "The Role of India in the Korean War," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 13(2), pages 21-37, June.
    2. Rai Singh, 1994. "Need for Restructuring of United Nations Organisation," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 50(4), pages 35-64, October.
    3. Gyoo-hyoung Kahng, 1998. "Zionism, Israel, and the Soviet Union: A study in the rise and fall of brief Soviet-Israeli friendship from 1945 to 1955," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 95-107.
    4. Kimhi, Ayai & Lerman, Zvi (ed.), 2015. "Agricultural transition in post-soviet Europe and Central Asia after 25 years: International workshop in honor of Professor Zvi Lerman," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 79, number 79.
    5. Petros Siousiouras & Georgios Chrysochou, 2014. "The Aegean Dispute in the Context of Contemporary Judicial Decisions on Maritime Delimitation," Laws, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-38, January.
    6. Havatzelet Yahel, 2019. "The Conflict Over Land Ownership and Unauthorized Construction in the Negev," Contemporary Review of the Middle East, , vol. 6(3-4), pages 352-369, September.
    7. Kimhi, Ayal & Swinnen, Johan & Van Herck, Kristine & Vranken, Liesbet & Csaki, Csaba & Jambor, Attila & Koester, Ulrich & Herzfeld, Thomas & Glauben, Thomas & Dries, Liesbeth & Teuber, Ramona & Meyers, 2015. "Agricultural transition in Post-Soviet Europe and Central Asia after 25 years: International workshop in honor of Professor Zvi Lerman," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies 207071, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    8. Daryna Abbakumova, 2019. "The Role Of The World Bank And The Imf In The International Financial System And The Human Rights Sphere," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 5(4).
    9. Imad El-Anis & Roy Smith, 2013. "Freshwater Security, Conflict, and Cooperation," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 29(1), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Rajiv Kumar, 2015. "Explaining the origins and evolution of India’s Korean policy," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 18(2), pages 182-198, June.
    11. Duan, Fengyu, 2017. "The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Modern History of Human Rights," LawArXiv 9uftm, Center for Open Science.
    12. Mar Gijón Mendigutía & José Abu-Tarbush, 2022. "The Palestinian Authority and the Reconfigured World Order: Between Multilateralism, Unilateralism, and Dependency Relationships," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 40-49.
    13. repec:zbw:iamost:207071 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Thao, Vu Thi & Wegelin, Philipp & von Arx, Widar, 2017. "Are statutory passenger watchdogs effective in representing passenger interests in public transport?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-9.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:1:y:1947:i:1:p:46-73_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ino .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.