IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/hecopl/v8y2013i04p529-535_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Universal health coverage and user charges

Author

Listed:
  • Smith, Peter C.

Abstract

There has been an explosion of interest in the concept of ‘universal health coverage’, fuelled by publication of the World Health Report 2010. This paper argues that the system of user charges for health services is a fundamental determinant of levels of coverage. A charge can lead to a loss of utility in two ways. Citizens who are deterred from using services by the charge will suffer an adverse health impact. And citizens who use the service will suffer a loss of wealth. The role of social health insurance is threefold: to reduce households’ financial risk associated with sickness; to promote enhanced access to needed health services; and to contribute to societal equity objectives, through an implicit financial transfer from rich to poor and healthy to sick. In principle, an optimal user charge policy can ensure that the social health insurance funds are used to best effect in pursuit of these objectives. This paper calls for a fundamental rethink of attitudes and policy towards user charges.

Suggested Citation

  • Smith, Peter C., 2013. "Universal health coverage and user charges," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(4), pages 529-535, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:8:y:2013:i:04:p:529-535_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744133113000285/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. K. P. M. Winssen & R. C. Kleef & W. P. M. M. Ven, 2016. "Potential determinants of deductible uptake in health insurance: How to increase uptake in The Netherlands?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(9), pages 1059-1072, December.
    2. Fengping Tian & Jiti Gao & Ke Yang, 2018. "A quantile regression approach to panel data analysis of health‐care expenditure in Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development countries," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(12), pages 1921-1944, December.
    3. Thomas Lefèvre & Claire Rondet & Isabelle Parizot & Pierre Chauvin, 2014. "Applying Multivariate Clustering Techniques to Health Data: The 4 Types of Healthcare Utilization in the Paris Metropolitan Area," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:8:y:2013:i:04:p:529-535_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/hep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.