IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/hecopl/v18y2023i3p289-304_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spillover effects of financial incentives for providers onto non-targeted patients: daycase surgery in English hospitals

Author

Listed:
  • Britteon, Philip
  • Kristensen, Søren Rud
  • Lau, Yiu-Shing
  • McDonald, Ruth
  • Sutton, Matt

Abstract

Background Incentives for healthcare providers may also affect non-targeted patients. These spillover effects have important implications for the full impact and evaluation of incentive schemes. However, there are few studies on the extent of such spillovers in health care. We investigated whether incentives to perform surgical procedures as daycases affected whether other elective procedures in the same specialties were also treated as daycases. Data 8,505,754 patients treated for 92 non-targeted procedures in 127 hospital trusts in England between April and March 2016. Methods Interrupted time series analysis of the probability of being treated as a daycase for non-targeted patients treated in six specialties where targeted patients were also treated and three specialties where they were not. Results The daycase rate initially increased (1.04 percentage points, SE: 0.30) for patients undergoing a non-targeted procedure in incentivised specialties but then reduced over time. Conversely, the daycase rate gradually decreased over time for patients treated in a non-incentivised specialty. Discussion Spillovers from financial incentives have variable effects over different activities and over time. Policymakers and researchers should consider the possibility of spillovers in the design and evaluation of incentive schemes.

Suggested Citation

  • Britteon, Philip & Kristensen, Søren Rud & Lau, Yiu-Shing & McDonald, Ruth & Sutton, Matt, 2023. "Spillover effects of financial incentives for providers onto non-targeted patients: daycase surgery in English hospitals," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(3), pages 289-304, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:18:y:2023:i:3:p:289-304_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744133123000063/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:18:y:2023:i:3:p:289-304_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/hep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.