IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/hecopl/v18y2023i2p172-185_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding public procurement within the health sector: a priority in a post-COVID-19 world

Author

Listed:
  • García-Altés, Anna
  • McKee, Martin
  • Siciliani, Luigi
  • Barros, Pedro Pita
  • Lehtonen, Lasse
  • Rogers, Heather
  • Kringos, Dionne
  • Zaletel, Jelka
  • De Maeseneer, Jan

Abstract

Every year, over 250,000 public authorities in the European Union (EU) spend about 14% of GDP on the purchase of services, works and supplies. Many are in the health sector, a sector in which public authorities are the main buyers in many countries. When these purchases exceed threshold values, EU public procurement rules apply. Public procurement is increasingly being promoted as a tool for improving efficiency and contributing to better health outcomes, and as a policy lever for achieving other government goals, such as innovation, the development of small and medium-sized enterprises, sustainable green growth and social objectives like public health and greater inclusiveness. In this paper, we describe the challenges that arise within health care systems with public procurement and identify potential solutions to them. We examined the tendering of pharmaceuticals, health technology, and e-health. In each case we identify a series of challenges relating to the complexity of the procurement process, imbalances in power on either side of transactions and the role of procurement in promoting broader public policy objectives. Finally, we recommend several actions that could stimulate better procurement, and suggest a few areas where further EU cooperation can be pursued.

Suggested Citation

  • García-Altés, Anna & McKee, Martin & Siciliani, Luigi & Barros, Pedro Pita & Lehtonen, Lasse & Rogers, Heather & Kringos, Dionne & Zaletel, Jelka & De Maeseneer, Jan, 2023. "Understanding public procurement within the health sector: a priority in a post-COVID-19 world," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 172-185, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:18:y:2023:i:2:p:172-185_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744133122000184/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:18:y:2023:i:2:p:172-185_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/hep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.