IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/hecopl/v16y2021i2p201-215_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

State strategies to address medicaid prescription spending: negotiated pricing vs price transparency

Author

Listed:
  • Noh, Shihyun
  • Janousek, Christian L.
  • Park, Ji Hyung

Abstract

This research longitudinally examines the association between levels of state Medicaid prescription spending and the state strategies intended to constrain cost increases: the negotiated pricing strategy, as indicated by state rebate programs, and the price transparency strategy, as indicated by state operation of All-Payer Claims Databases. The findings demonstrate evidence that state Medicaid prescription spending is influenced by the negotiated pricing strategy, especially Managed Care Organization (MCO) rebates under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, but not influenced by the price transparency strategy. State decisions for MCO rebates, such as carving prescription benefits into managed care benefits, were effective in containing levels of Medicaid prescription spending over time, while other single- and multi-state rebate programs were not. Based on these findings, state policymakers may consider utilizing the MCO rebate program to address increases in Medicaid prescription spending.

Suggested Citation

  • Noh, Shihyun & Janousek, Christian L. & Park, Ji Hyung, 2021. "State strategies to address medicaid prescription spending: negotiated pricing vs price transparency," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 201-215, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:16:y:2021:i:2:p:201-215_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744133120000080/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:16:y:2021:i:2:p:201-215_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/hep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.