IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/hecopl/v13y2018i02p118-136_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Norwegian National Council for Priority Setting in Health Care: decisions and justifications 1

Author

Listed:
  • Wester, Gry
  • Bringedal, Berit

Abstract

Different countries have adopted different strategies for tackling the challenge of allocating scarce health care resources fairly. Norway is one of the countries that has pioneered the effort to resolve priority setting by using a core set of priority-setting criteria. While the criteria themselves have been subject to extensive debate and numerous revisions, the question of how the criteria have been applied in practice has received less attention. In this paper, we examine how the criteria feature in the decisions and justifications of the Norwegian National Council for Priority Setting in Health Care, which has played an active role in deliberating about health care provision and coverage in Norway. We conducted a comprehensive document analysis, looking at the Council’s decisions about health care allocation as well as the reasons they had provided to justify their decisions. We found that although the Council often made use of the official priority-setting criteria, they did so in an unsystematic and inconsistent manner.

Suggested Citation

  • Wester, Gry & Bringedal, Berit, 2018. "The Norwegian National Council for Priority Setting in Health Care: decisions and justifications 1," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(2), pages 118-136, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:13:y:2018:i:02:p:118-136_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744133117000020/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:13:y:2018:i:02:p:118-136_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/hep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.