IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/hecopl/v11y2016i04p379-395_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How does the pharmaceutical industry influence prescription? A qualitative study of provider payment incentives and drug remunerations in hospitals in Shanghai

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Wei

Abstract

Over-prescription has become one major problem in China’s health care sector. Incorporating interview data from hospitals in Shanghai, this paper provided empirical evidence on how the process of over-prescription was carried out in day-to-day clinical settings, and demonstrates various mechanisms that allow over-prescription to continue vigorously in the context of the Chinese health care system. In particular, this study identified four levels of incentives that over-prescription was carried out: hospital, medical department, doctors and pharmaceutical companies. Due to the insufficient funding from the government and rising operational costs, hospitals had to rely on the sales of drugs and provision of medical services to survive. This funding pressure then transferred to specific revenue targets for medical departments. A combination of incentives, including drug remunerations, bonus system, low pay and high workloads motivated over-prescription at doctor level. At pharmaceutical company level, high profits of pharmaceuticals products as well as lack of emphasis on efficacy of drugs led to under-table payments and illicit drug remunerations. The study argued that the way that the Chinese health care system operates was based on the profit-seeking principle rather than on fulfilling its social functions, and called for a systematic reform of provider incentives to eradicating the problem of over-prescription.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Wei, 2016. "How does the pharmaceutical industry influence prescription? A qualitative study of provider payment incentives and drug remunerations in hospitals in Shanghai," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(4), pages 379-395, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:11:y:2016:i:04:p:379-395_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744133116000086/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chi Shen & Qiwei Deng & Sha Lai & Liu Yang & Dantong Zhao & Yaxin Zhao & Zhongliang Zhou, 2024. "New evidence on supplier-induced demand in China’s public tertiary hospitals: is the cost of hospitalization higher in the off-season?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(6), pages 951-962, August.
    2. Qian Long & Weixi Jiang & Di Dong & Jiaying Chen & Li Xiang & Qiang Li & Fei Huang & Henry Lucas & Shenglan Tang, 2020. "A New Financing Model for Tuberculosis (TB) Care in China: Challenges of Policy Development and Lessons Learned from the Implementation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-11, February.
    3. Kanavos, Panos & Mills, Mackenzie & Zhang, Anwen, 2019. "Pharmaceutical policy in China," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108473, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Alex Jingwei He & Yumeng Fan & Rui Su, 2022. "Seeking policy solutions in a complex system: experimentalist governance in China’s healthcare reform," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(4), pages 755-776, December.
    5. Yuqing Tang & Chaojie Liu & Junjie Liu & Xinping Zhang & Keyuan Zuo, 2018. "Effects of County Public Hospital Reform on Procurement Costs and Volume of Antibiotics: A Quasi-Natural Experiment in Hubei Province, China," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 36(8), pages 995-1004, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:11:y:2016:i:04:p:379-395_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/hep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.