IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/hecopl/v10y2015i02p183-193_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the margins of health economics: a response to ‘resolving NICE’S nasty dilemma’

Author

Listed:
  • Birch, Stephen
  • Gafni, Amiram

Abstract

In a 2011 article published in this journal, Baker et al. set out to resolve a nasty dilemma for NICE by reconciling two approaches for determining whether adopting a new intervention would increase total health gains produced from available resources and hence increase system efficiency. In this response we show how the proposed reconciliation, as well as the two approaches on which it is based, fail to inform decision makers about the efficiency of a new intervention. We show how this arises from the misuse of incremental costs and effects of between-intervention comparisons as measures of changes in costs and effects associated with marginal adjustments to the scale of an intervention. Ironically, incremental data represent the choices faced by decision makers and we illustrate a method for determining unambiguously whether a new intervention represents an improvement in efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Birch, Stephen & Gafni, Amiram, 2015. "On the margins of health economics: a response to ‘resolving NICE’S nasty dilemma’," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 183-193, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:10:y:2015:i:02:p:183-193_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744133114000462/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Afschin Gandjour, 2023. "A Model-Based Estimate of the Cost-Effectiveness Threshold in Germany," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 627-635, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:10:y:2015:i:02:p:183-193_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/hep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.