IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/hecopl/v10y2015i01p45-59_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The crisis as catalyst for reframing health care policies in the European Union †

Author

Listed:
  • Helderman, Jan-Kees

Abstract

Seen from the perspective of health, the global financial crisis (GFC) may be conceived of as an exogenous factor that has undermined the fiscal sustainability of European welfare states and consequently, their (expanding) health systems as well. Being one of the core programs of European welfare states, health care has always belonged to the sovereignty of European Member States. However, in past two decades, European welfare states have in fact become semi-sovereign states and the European Union (EU) no longer is an exogenous actor in European health policy making. Today, the EU not only puts limits to unsustainable growth levels in health care spending, it also acts as an health policy agenda setter. Since the outbreak of the GFC, it does so in an increasingly coercive and persuasive way, claiming authority over health system reforms alongside the responsibilities of its Member States.

Suggested Citation

  • Helderman, Jan-Kees, 2015. "The crisis as catalyst for reframing health care policies in the European Union †," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 45-59, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:10:y:2015:i:01:p:45-59_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744133114000231/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schmidt, Andrea E. & Bobek, Julia & Mathis-Edenhofer, Stefan & Schwarz, Tanja & Bachner, Florian, 2022. "Cross-border healthcare collaborations in Europe (2007–2017): Moving towards a European Health Union?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(12), pages 1241-1247.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:10:y:2015:i:01:p:45-59_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/hep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.