IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/eurrev/v29y2021i2p274-284_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parallelism and Antithesis: Structural Principles in the Mind and in Literature from a Chinese Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Longxi, Zhang

Abstract

Roman Jakobson famously defined poetry as pivoting on the metaphorical axis with parallelism as a major feature, and James Kugel argues that parallelism is the defining feature of biblical poetry. The parallel structure – including its variations of symmetry and antithesis – is crucial for classical Chinese poetry. In drawing on both Chinese and Western critical views on the symmetrical structure of parallelism and antithesis, this paper will explore the relationship between the cognitive and linguistic correlation in the formation of parallel structure in literary language, particularly poetry, and argue for the basis of parallelism as deeply embedded in the mind and manifested in literary expressions.

Suggested Citation

  • Longxi, Zhang, 2021. "Parallelism and Antithesis: Structural Principles in the Mind and in Literature from a Chinese Perspective," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(2), pages 274-284, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:29:y:2021:i:2:p:274-284_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S106279872000040X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:29:y:2021:i:2:p:274-284_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/erw .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.