IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/eurrev/v28y2020i2p202-224_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heterogeneity of the European Union’s Strategic Partners: Can They Still be Compatible?

Author

Listed:
  • Rivera, Pablo Podadera
  • Garashchuk, Anna

Abstract

This article paper aims to investigate the EU’s strategic partners using both theoretical and empirical analysis. Applying the technique of cluster analysis has allowed us, first, to demonstrate that not all of the EU’s ‘special ten’ are strategically sound for the EU; second, to investigate which regional organizations represent the best interest of the EU from a strategic standpoint; third, to find out the true potential of the EU’s strategic partners; and, finally, to prove empirically that the EU’s strategic partners are so heterogeneous as to represent a collective response to multilateralism and that a bilateral approach should be applied instead, taking into consideration the specific character of every strategic partner.

Suggested Citation

  • Rivera, Pablo Podadera & Garashchuk, Anna, 2020. "Heterogeneity of the European Union’s Strategic Partners: Can They Still be Compatible?," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(2), pages 202-224, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:28:y:2020:i:2:p:202-224_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1062798719000450/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:28:y:2020:i:2:p:202-224_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/erw .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.