IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/eurrev/v26y2018is1ps48-s56_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Excellence of Universities versus Autonomy, Funding and Accountability

Author

Listed:
  • Michavila, Francisco
  • Martinez, Jorge M.

Abstract

Universities see a need for major changes in their organisational structures and functioning to be able to respond adequately to current social expectations. A greater provision of funds and an increase of university autonomy are priorities of today’s university policy. This article presents the results of relating excellence and autonomy through data from the Academic Ranking of World Universities of the University of Shanghai and the indicators developed by the European University Association for four types of university autonomy: organisational, academic, staffing and financial.

Suggested Citation

  • Michavila, Francisco & Martinez, Jorge M., 2018. "Excellence of Universities versus Autonomy, Funding and Accountability," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(S1), pages 48-56, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:26:y:2018:i:s1:p:s48-s56_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1062798717000539/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Górska Anna & Pikos Anna & Dobija Dorota & Grossi Giuseppe, 2022. "Autonomy Without Accountability in Resource Allocation Reforms: Blending Old and New Logic in Universities," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 30(2), pages 43-82, June.
    2. Alice Civera & Michele Meoli, 2024. "Corporate entrepreneurship strategy in universities: emerging leadership in austerity time," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 2080-2103, December.
    3. Mónica Benito & Pilar Gil & Rosario Romera, 2019. "Funding, is it key for standing out in the university rankings?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(2), pages 771-792, November.
    4. Górska Anna & Pikos Anna & Dobija Dorota & Grossi Giuseppe, 2022. "Autonomy Without Accountability in Resource Allocation Reforms: Blending Old and New Logic in Universities," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 30(1), pages 43-82, June.
    5. Benito, M. & Gil, P. & Romera, R., 2020. "Evaluating the influence of country characteristics on the Higher Education System Rankings’ progress," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:26:y:2018:i:s1:p:s48-s56_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/erw .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.