IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/eurrev/v25y2017i01p20-38_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anchoring Innovation: A Classical Research Agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Sluiter, Ineke

Abstract

Several periods in classical (Greco-Roman) antiquity provide an intriguing mix of being ‘in the grip of the past’ and profoundly innovative in all societal domains at the same time. A new research agenda of the Dutch classicists investigates this combination, under the hypothesis that the two are connected. Successful innovations must somehow be ‘anchored’ for the relevant social group(s). This paper explores the new concept of ‘anchoring’, and some of the ways in which ‘the new’ and ‘the old’ are evaluated and used in classical antiquity and our own times. Its examples range from a piece of ancient theatrical equipment to the history of the revolving door, from an ornamental feature of Greek temples to the design of electric cars, and from the Delphic oracle to the role of the American constitution.

Suggested Citation

  • Sluiter, Ineke, 2017. "Anchoring Innovation: A Classical Research Agenda," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 20-38, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:25:y:2017:i:01:p:20-38_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1062798716000442/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonius Schröder & Daniel Krüger, 2019. "Social Innovation as a Driver for New Educational Practices: Modernising, Repairing and Transforming the Education System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:25:y:2017:i:01:p:20-38_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/erw .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.