IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/eurrev/v20y2012i02p182-194_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rich Media and Rich Science; Web Squared Cumulativity Conceptualization

Author

Listed:
  • Westlund, Oscar

Abstract

Scientists work by collecting observable evidence of different phenomena, from which they analyse and construct theoretical explanations. Consequently, science involves systematic efforts to increase human knowledge, a phenomenon that is usually described as ‘cumulativity’. Most scientists would probably agree that (excellent) research should be cumulative, and by this they usually mean that scientists should accommodate and refer to the publications of other scholars. This article suggests that our perception of science would benefit from a broader and more nuanced approach to cumulativity. The article therefore provides a discussion on how contemporary scholars can approach cumulativity by adopting the fundamental ideology of the web 2.0 and web squared concepts. A proposition for an altered approach is posited through web squared cumulativity conceptualization, involving a more open and collaborative approach. The discussion provides a foretaste of contemporary initiatives that suggest the spread of this emerging trend.

Suggested Citation

  • Westlund, Oscar, 2012. "Rich Media and Rich Science; Web Squared Cumulativity Conceptualization," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 182-194, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:20:y:2012:i:02:p:182-194_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1062798711000433/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Efstathios A. Sidiropoulos & Andreas A. Veglis, 2017. "Computer Supported Collaborative Work trends on Media Organizations: Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 5(1), pages 63-78, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:20:y:2012:i:02:p:182-194_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/erw .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.