IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/eurrev/v15y2007i03p275-282_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time for a rethink of research proposal evaluation?

Author

Listed:
  • WEAIRE, DENIS

Abstract

The processes of research proposals and evaluation have become ever more elaborate, but the system remains primitive. This paper argues for a fresh look at existing practices, with a view to developing less onerous and more efficient systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Weaire, Denis, 2007. "Time for a rethink of research proposal evaluation?," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 275-282, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:15:y:2007:i:03:p:275-282_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1062798707000300/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marco Pautasso & Hanno Schäfer, 2010. "Peer review delay and selectivity in ecology journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 307-315, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:15:y:2007:i:03:p:275-282_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/erw .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.