IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/eurrev/v12y2004i03p445-460_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The state of the modern Olympics: citius, altius, fortius?

Author

Listed:
  • CROWTHER, NIGEL

Abstract

Baron Pierre de Coubertin purported to follow the traditions of the ancient Olympic Games, but adapted them to fit his own political, social, and sporting conceptions. From their very beginning, the modern Games have had aspirations that have extended beyond sport. After brief comments on corruption, philosophy of life, and spectacle, this essay examines the Olympic Games in terms of amateurism and professionalism; winning and the joy of participation; nationalism and ultra-nationalism; the medal count; war, violence, and peace; performance-enhancing drugs; women and minorities; and the Americanization of the Games.

Suggested Citation

  • Crowther, Nigel, 2004. "The state of the modern Olympics: citius, altius, fortius?," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 445-460, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:12:y:2004:i:03:p:445-460_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1062798704000377/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alejandro Leiva-Arcas & Raquel Vaquero-Cristóbal & Lucía Abenza-Cano & Antonio Sánchez-Pato, 2021. "Performance of high-level Spanish athletes in the Olympic Games according to gender," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-11, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:12:y:2004:i:03:p:445-460_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/erw .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.