IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/etheor/v40y2024i6p1253-1310_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sharp Test For Equilibrium Uniqueness In Discrete Games With Private Information And Common Knowledge Unobserved Heterogeneity

Author

Listed:
  • Marcoux, Mathieu

Abstract

This paper proposes a test of the single equilibrium in the data assumption commonly maintained when estimating static discrete games of incomplete information. By allowing for discrete common knowledge payoff-relevant unobserved heterogeneity, the test generalizes existing methods attributing all correlation between players’ decisions to multiple equilibria. It does not require the estimation of payoffs and is therefore useful in empirical applications leveraging multiple equilibria to identify the model’s primitives. The procedure boils down to testing the emptiness of the set of data generating processes that can rationalize the sample through a single equilibrium and a finite mixture over unobserved heterogeneity. Under verifiable conditions, this testable implication is generically sufficient for degenerate equilibrium selection. The main identifying assumption is the existence of an observable variable that plays the role of a proxy for the unobservable heterogeneity. Examples of such proxies are provided based on empirical applications from the existing literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcoux, Mathieu, 2024. "Sharp Test For Equilibrium Uniqueness In Discrete Games With Private Information And Common Knowledge Unobserved Heterogeneity," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(6), pages 1253-1310, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:40:y:2024:i:6:p:1253-1310_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266466623000063/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:40:y:2024:i:6:p:1253-1310_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ect .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.