IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/etheor/v25y2009i01p162-194_09.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On The Lack Of Power Of Omnibus Specification Tests

Author

Listed:
  • Escanciano, J. Carlos

Abstract

Designed to have power against all alternatives, omnibus consistent tests are the primary econometric tools for testing the correct specification of parametric conditional means when there is no information about the possible alternative. The main purpose of this paper is to show that, contrary to what is generally believed, omnibus specification tests only have substantial local power against alternatives in a finite-dimensional space (usually unknown to the researcher). We call such a space the principal space. We characterize and estimate the principal space for Cramér–von Mises tests. These results are some of the by-products of a detailed theoretical power analysis carried out in the paper. This investigation focuses on the class of the so-called integrated consistent tests under possibly heteroskedastic time series. A Monte Carlo experiment examines the finite-sample properties of tests and estimators of preferred alternatives. Finally, an application of our theory to test the martingale difference hypothesis of some exchange rates provides new information on the rejection of omnibus tests and illustrates our findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Escanciano, J. Carlos, 2009. "On The Lack Of Power Of Omnibus Specification Tests," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 162-194, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:25:y:2009:i:01:p:162-194_09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266466608090051/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gijbels, Irène & Omelka, Marek & Veraverbeke, Noël, 2021. "Omnibus test for covariate effects in conditional copula models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    2. Kristensen, Dennis, 2011. "Semi-nonparametric estimation and misspecification testing of diffusion models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 164(2), pages 382-403, October.
    3. Hsu, Shih-Hsun & Kuan, Chung-Ming, 2014. "Constructing smooth tests without estimating the eigenpairs of the limiting process," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 178(P1), pages 71-79.
    4. Escanciano, Juan Carlos & Mayoral, Silvia, 2010. "Data-driven smooth tests for the martingale difference hypothesis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(8), pages 1983-1998, August.
    5. Pedro H. C. Sant’Anna, 2017. "Testing for Uncorrelated Residuals in Dynamic Count Models With an Application to Corporate Bankruptcy," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 349-358, July.
    6. Escanciano, Juan Carlos & Velasco, Carlos, 2010. "Specification tests of parametric dynamic conditional quantiles," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 159(1), pages 209-221, November.
    7. Zu, Yang & Boswijk, H. Peter, 2017. "Consistent nonparametric specification tests for stochastic volatility models based on the return distribution," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 53-75.
    8. Amengual, Dante & Carrasco, Marine & Sentana, Enrique, 2020. "Testing distributional assumptions using a continuum of moments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 655-689.
    9. repec:hal:journl:peer-00732534 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C. & Song, Xiaojun, 2019. "Specification tests for the propensity score," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 210(2), pages 379-404.
    11. Zu, Y., 2015. "Consistent nonparametric specification tests for stochastic volatility models based on the return distribution," Working Papers 15/02, Department of Economics, City University London.
    12. Simos G. Meintanis & Bojana Milošević & Marko Obradović, 2020. "Goodness-of-fit tests in conditional duration models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 123-140, February.
    13. Feiyu Jiang & Emmanuel Selorm Tsyawo, 2022. "A Consistent ICM-based $\chi^2$ Specification Test," Papers 2208.13370, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    14. Wenceslao González-Manteiga & Rosa Crujeiras, 2013. "An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 361-411, September.
    15. Escanciano, Juan Carlos & Velasco, Carlos, 2010. "Specification tests of parametric dynamic conditional quantiles," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 159(1), pages 209-221, November.
    16. Escanciano, Juan Carlos & Song, Kyungchul, 2010. "Testing single-index restrictions with a focus on average derivatives," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 156(2), pages 377-391, June.
    17. Escanciano, J. Carlos & Lobato, Ignacio N., 2009. "An automatic Portmanteau test for serial correlation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 151(2), pages 140-149, August.
    18. Sangyeol Lee & Simos G. Meintanis & Minyoung Jo, 2019. "Inferential procedures based on the integrated empirical characteristic function," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 103(3), pages 357-386, September.
    19. Juan Carlos Escanciano & Chuan Goh, 2010. "Specification Analysis of Structural Quantile Regression Models," Working Papers tecipa-415, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:25:y:2009:i:01:p:162-194_09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ect .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.