IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/etheor/v23y2007i06p1083-1107_07.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimality Of Gls For One-Step-Ahead Forecasting With Regarima And Related Models When The Regression Is Misspecified

Author

Listed:
  • Findley, David F.

Abstract

We consider the modeling of a time series described by a linear regression component whose regressor sequence satisfies the generalized asymptotic sample second moment stationarity conditions of Grenander (1954, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 25, 252–272). The associated disturbance process is only assumed to have sample second moments that converge with increasing series length, perhaps after a differencing operation. The model's regression component, which can be stochastic, is taken to be underspecified, perhaps as a result of simplifications, approximations, or parsimony. Also, the autoregressive moving average (ARMA) or autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model used for the disturbances need not be correct. Both ordinary least squares (OLS) and generalized least squares (GLS) estimates of the mean function are considered. An optimality property of GLS relative to OLS is obtained for one-step-ahead forecasting. Asymptotic bias characteristics of the regression estimates are shown to distinguish the forecasting performance. The results provide theoretical support for a procedure used by Statistics Netherlands to impute the values of late reporters in some economic surveys.The author thanks two referees and the co-editor for comments and suggestions that led to substantial improvements in the exposition and also thanks John Aston and Tucker McElroy for helpful comments on an earlier draft. Any views expressed are the author's and not necessarily those of the U.S. Census Bureau.

Suggested Citation

  • Findley, David F., 2007. "Optimality Of Gls For One-Step-Ahead Forecasting With Regarima And Related Models When The Regression Is Misspecified," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(6), pages 1083-1107, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:23:y:2007:i:06:p:1083-1107_07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266466607070430/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohamed Gaber & Edward J. Lusk, 2018. "Analytical Procedures Phase of PCAOB Audits: A Note of Caution in Selecting the Forecasting Model," Applied Finance and Accounting, Redfame publishing, vol. 4(1), pages 73-81, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:23:y:2007:i:06:p:1083-1107_07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ect .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.