Author
Abstract
The secular process of convergence in income and product per capita among industrial countries has attracted much well-deserved attention. In Western Europe especially, the cradle of modern industry, this attention has focused on the ways in which ‘follower countries’ have caught up with (or fallen behind) the long-time ‘regional’ technological leader, Great Britain. In this context, a long tradition considers France as offering the standard alternative to modern British economic institutions and development (Kindleberger 1964). With regard to economic performance, however, it is only recently that claims have been backed by systematic quantitative evidence. Despite sometimes conflicting interpretations, a consensus view has gradually emerged (Crouzet 2003) which concludes that the Anglo-French gap in income and productive capacity slowly closed from the mid-nineteenth to the mid-twentieth century, reconciling ex post calculations with some of the conclusions of enlightened contemporaries and later historians (Bairoch 1982, Crafts 1984). After World War II and the introduction of standardised national accounts, the course of productivity and real income per head in both countries is much better documented and suggests the completion of the secular catching-up process by the 1960s (Van Ark 1990). However, between the ‘controlled conjectures’ of the pre-World War I era and the quasi-certainties of post-1945, the interwar years still remain a grey zone. During the 1920s, Britain's industry, marred by industrial unrest, mass unemployment and loss of competitiveness, is supposed to have fared especially poorly compared with its competitors, Germany and the US. In a book published in 1931, a French scholar, André Siegfried, claimed that Britain was descending along the path of industrial decline (Siegfried 1931). By this time, France had completed its postwar reconstruction, the value of the franc had been stabilised, and the French economy was in full swing: in 1930 French public opinion basked complacently in the belief that the country would be spared the devastating effects of the depression sparked by the Wall Street crash.
Suggested Citation
Dormois, Jean-Pierre, 2004.
"Episodes in catching-up: Anglo-French industrial productivity differentials in 1930,"
European Review of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 337-373, December.
Handle:
RePEc:cup:ereveh:v:8:y:2004:i:03:p:337-373_00
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Fremdling, Rainer & Jong, Herman de & Timmer, Marcel P., 2007.
"Censuses compared. A New Benchmark for British and German Manufacturing 1935/1936,"
GGDC Research Memorandum
GD-90, Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen.
- Ho, Chi Pui, 2016.
"Rise of Women in Unified Growth Theory: French Development Process and Policy Implications,"
MPRA Paper
73864, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Felice, Emanuele & Carreras, Albert, 2012.
"When did modernization begin? Italy's industrial growth reconsidered in light of new value-added series, 1911–1951,"
Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 443-460.
- repec:dgr:rugggd:gd-90 is not listed on IDEAS
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:ereveh:v:8:y:2004:i:03:p:337-373_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ere .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.