IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/endeec/v7y2002i01p75-105_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of China's pollution levy system: an equilibrium pollution approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jiang, Tingsong
  • McKibbin, Warwick J.

Abstract

There is considerable concern about the effectiveness of China's pollution control policies. Despite government intervention, measures of pollution continue to rise. However, this does not mean that policies have necessarily been ineffective. What matters for the effectiveness of policy is not the overall level of pollution but whether the extent of pollution is improving relative to what it otherwise would have been without a policy intervention. This paper assesses the effectiveness of China's pollution levy system on water pollution, air pollution, and solid wastes using econometric techniques to estimate the effectiveness of government intervention. The paper first sets out a theoretical equilibrium model of pollution and then uses this to derive equations for the demand and supply of pollutants. This theoretical framework is then used to develop an econometrically estimated model. We find that it is possible to estimate a well-defined demand function for pollution (a reduction in environmental quality) but are unable to estimate the supply of environmental goods, suggesting that government regulation rather than consumer preferences are determining the rate of environmental degradation in China. We also find that the pollution levy system has been effective in reducing pollution relative to what it otherwise would have been in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiang, Tingsong & McKibbin, Warwick J., 2002. "Assessment of China's pollution levy system: an equilibrium pollution approach," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 75-105, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:7:y:2002:i:01:p:75-105_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1355770X02000050/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xun Cao & Qing Deng & Xiaojun Li & Zijie Shao, 2022. "Fine me if you can: Fixed asset intensity and enforcement of environmental regulations in China," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 983-1004, October.
    2. Pedro Naso & Yi Huang Author Name: Tim Swanson, 2017. "The Porter Hypothesis Goes to China: Spatial Development, Environmental Regulation and Productivity," CIES Research Paper series 53-2017, Centre for International Environmental Studies, The Graduate Institute.
    3. Stern, David I., 2004. "The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1419-1439, August.
    4. Fujii, Hidemichi & Kaneko, Shinji & Managi, Shunsuke, 2010. "Changes in environmentally sensitive productivity and technological modernization in China's iron and steel industry in the 1990s," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(4), pages 485-504, August.
    5. Amir Hossein Montazer Hojat & Khalid Abdul Rahim & Lee Chin, 2010. "Firm's Environmental Performance: A Review of Their Determinants," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 2(3), pages 330-338, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:7:y:2002:i:01:p:75-105_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ede .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.