IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/endeec/v28y2023i4p307-331_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

COVID-19 lockdown and municipal solid waste: evidence from the discarding records of 252 communities in China

Author

Listed:
  • Kong, Dongmin
  • Liu, Chenhao
  • Han, Ling

Abstract

This study investigates the impacts of the COVID-19 lockdown on municipal solid waste (MSW). Based on a unique data set of daily discarding records of 252 communities in Beijing, China, we conduct a difference-in-differences estimation and find that the total daily MSW decreased by 134.16 kg in a community, which is equivalent to at least 0.22 kg per household per day, and the average weight of MSW per package decreased by 56.8 per cent after the COVID-19 lockdown. We consider a series of potential mechanisms, such as MSW hoarding, shifts in discarding time, and fear of going out, and find the most support for consumption pattern shifts with reduced consumption. We then discuss the effect of the lockdown on the reduction of MSW generation because of the strict restriction of consumption. We also conduct various heterogeneity analyses. Our results present clear implications for municipal waste management by highlighting the effect of the lockdown on the generation of MSW and the underlying consumption mechanism.

Suggested Citation

  • Kong, Dongmin & Liu, Chenhao & Han, Ling, 2023. "COVID-19 lockdown and municipal solid waste: evidence from the discarding records of 252 communities in China," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(4), pages 307-331, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:28:y:2023:i:4:p:307-331_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1355770X22000353/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:28:y:2023:i:4:p:307-331_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ede .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.