IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/endeec/v28y2023i2p130-148_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk aversion and cleaner cooking fuel choice: an empirical study in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Adjei-Mantey, Kwame
  • Takeuchi, Kenji

Abstract

Cleaner cooking is an important policy objective in the bid to achieve sustainable development. Despite efforts to encourage cleaner cooking fuel use, biomass fuel is still widely used in many developing countries. This study investigates the role of behavioral factors, particularly risk aversion, in the choice of cooking fuels in Ghana. In addition, we investigate how the improvement of supply infrastructure and services mitigates the impact of risk preferences in fuel choices. By employing data from the recent round of the Ghana Living Standards Survey, we find that risk-averse households are less likely to choose liquified petroleum gas as their cooking fuel. However, the effect is mitigated for households located in districts with more supply infrastructure. Additional analyses reveal the influence of risk and time preferences in other household behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Adjei-Mantey, Kwame & Takeuchi, Kenji, 2023. "Risk aversion and cleaner cooking fuel choice: an empirical study in Ghana," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(2), pages 130-148, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:28:y:2023:i:2:p:130-148_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1355770X22000122/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:28:y:2023:i:2:p:130-148_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ede .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.