IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/ecnphi/v41y2025i1p178-185_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On not holding women to higher standards of justice than men: gender justice, even for millionaire women

Author

Listed:
  • Barclay, Linda
  • McKenna, Tessa

Abstract

In a recent article in this journal, James Christensen, Tom Parr and David Axelsen argue that millionaire salaries are unjust and women have no grounds of fairness to unjust salaries in parity with men. They accept that disrespect is expressed toward women when they are paid less than men because of their gender. Their argument largely replicates a similar argument developed earlier by Anca Gheaus. By drawing on the distinction between ideal and nonideal theory, we argue that Christensen et al. and Gheaus hold women to unacceptably high standards of justice and arguably higher standards than men are held to.

Suggested Citation

  • Barclay, Linda & McKenna, Tessa, 2025. "On not holding women to higher standards of justice than men: gender justice, even for millionaire women," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(1), pages 178-185, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:ecnphi:v:41:y:2025:i:1:p:178-185_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266267124000245/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:ecnphi:v:41:y:2025:i:1:p:178-185_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/eap .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.