IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buhirw/v98y2024i2p417-446_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing the Police Workforce: Sickness and Pensions in the Metropolitan Police in Late Nineteenth-Century London

Author

Listed:
  • Green, David
  • Brown, Douglas
  • Smith, Harry
  • Chick, Joe
  • Preger, Natasha

Abstract

The provision of pensions for Civil Servants and other employees in public office, such as the police, as well as in large private businesses, became more widespread in the second half of the nineteenth century. Such pensions, and other non-pay benefits, including sick pay, not only helped with recruitment but also provided a means of managing the retirement of workers who were deemed to be incapable of performing their roles. The rules governing eligibility to receive a pension in the Metropolitan Police in London were closely linked to the certification of poor health. Police doctors restricted the certification of sickness as a reason for retirement because it impacted the size of the force, resulted in the loss of more experienced men, and added to the cost of the pension fund. This strategy generated conflict with the workforce, resulting in industrial unrest. Piecemeal reforms failed to address workers’ concerns until 1890, when the rights to receive a pension were improved. These reforms, rather than stricter vigilance by police doctors, were an effective way of retaining experienced officers in the police force.

Suggested Citation

  • Green, David & Brown, Douglas & Smith, Harry & Chick, Joe & Preger, Natasha, 2024. "Managing the Police Workforce: Sickness and Pensions in the Metropolitan Police in Late Nineteenth-Century London," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 98(2), pages 417-446, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buhirw:v:98:y:2024:i:2:p:417-446_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007680524000278/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buhirw:v:98:y:2024:i:2:p:417-446_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bhr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.